Influence of a Biostimulant on Yield And Quality of Sharad Seedless Grape


NA Deshmukh
H Saste
S Gat
SK Gather


The effect of the biostimulant was studied on the yield and quality of the Sharad Seedless grape variety. Biostimulant i.e. Super Shakti Combine was sprayed at 3-4 mm and 6-8 mm berry size @ 500 ml per ha; 750 ml per ha; 1000 ml per ha; 1240 ml per ha; 1000 ml per ha (at 3-4 mm berry size), 1000 ml per ha (at 6-8 mm berry size) and control. Among the different treatments, application of 1250 ml per ha exhibited a significant increase in bunch weight (439.2 g), berry weight (5.78 g), 50-berry weight (286.2 g), berry length (25.5 mm), berry diameter (21.6 mm) followed by 1000 ml per ha (432.8 g, 5.59 g, 282.6 g, 25.1 mm, 20.7 mm), respectively. The highest yield (14.02 kg per vine) was recorded in treatment 1250 ml per ha at per with treatment 1000 ml per ha (13.75 kg per vine) with minimum physiological loss in weight during the storage. Thus the application of biostimulant i.e., Super Shakti Combine is found suitable to improve the yield and quality of grapes cv. Sharad Seedless.


How to Cite
Deshmukh, N., Saste, H., Gat, S., Saniya, & Gather, S. (2023). Influence of a Biostimulant on Yield And Quality of Sharad Seedless Grape. Grape Insight, 1(2), 89–95.


  1. Anonymous (2022) Department of agriculture and farm-ers welfare (Third Advanced Estimate). Available from:
  2. AOAC (2023) Official Methods of analysis of AOAC inter-national (22nd ed). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, USA
  3. APEDA (2022) Analytical trade profile of fresh grapes. Available from: in/indexp/Pro duc t_des cr ipt ion_32he adC har t. aspx?gcode=0205
  4. Asghari M and Rezaei-Rad R (2018) 24-Epibrassinolide enhanced the quality parameters and phytochemical contents of table grape. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality91: 226-231
  5. Basile B, Brown N, Valdes JM, Cardarelli M, Scognamiglio P, Mataffo A, Rouphael Y, Bonini P and Colla G (2021) Plant-based biostimulant as sustainable alternative to synthetic growth regulators in two sweet cherry cultivars. Plants10:619. PMid:33805215 PMCid:PMC8064333
  6. Bhat ZA, Reddy YN, Srihari D, Bhat JA, Rashid R and Rather JA(2011) New generation growth regula-tors - brassinosteroids and CPPU improve bunch and berry characteristics in ‘Tas-A-Ganesh’ Grape. International Journal of Fruit Science11:309-315
  7. Bulgari R, Cocetta G, Trivellini A, Vernieri P and Ferrante A (2014) Biostimulants and crop responses: a review. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture31(1):1-17.
  8. Champa W, Gill M, Mahajan BVC, Aror NK and Bedi S (2015) Brassinosteroids improve quality of table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Flame Seedless. Tropical Agricultural Research26: 368-379 v26i2.8099
  9. Du Jardin P (2012) The science of plant biostimulants-a bib-liographic analysis. European Commission; Brussels, Belgium
  10. El-Borray M, Mostafa M and Hamed A (2007) Effect of some biostimulant on yield and berry qualities of grapevines. Journal of Agriculture Science Mansoura University32(6):4729-4744 jpp.2007.208792
  11. Ghorbani P, Eshghi S and Haghi H (2017) Effects of brassi-nosteroid (24-epibrassinolide) on yield and quality of grape (Vitis viniferaL.) ‘Thompson Seedless’. Vitis56: 113-117
  12. Isci B and Gokbayrak Z (2015) Influence of brassinosteroids on fruit yield and quality of table grape ‘Alphonse Lavallée’. Vitis54:17-19
  13. Khatoon F, Kundu M, Mir H andNahakpam S (2021) Efficacy of foliar feeding of brassinosteroid to improve growth, yield and fruit quality of strawberry (Fragaria × Ananassa Duch.) grown under subtropical plain. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis52(8):803-814 https://
  14. Liu Q, Xi Z, Gao J, Meng Y, Lin S and Zhang Z (2016) Effects ofexogenous 24-epibrassinolide to control grey mould and maintain post-harvest quality of table grapes. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 51:236-1243
  15. Monteiro E, Gonçalves B, Cortez I and Castro I (2022) The role of biostimulants as alleviators of biotic and abiotic stresses in grapevine: A review. Plants11: 396 PMCid:PMC8839214
  16. Salvi L, Cataldo E, Secco S and Mattii G (2016) Use of natu-ral biostimulant to improve the quality of grapevine production: First results. Acta horticulturae1148: 77-84
  17. Senthilkumar S, Vijayakumar RM, Soorianathasundaram K and Devi DD (2018) Impact of pre-harvest sprays with gibberellic acid on yield and economics of grape (Vitis viniferaL.) cv. Italia Annals of Biology34:170-175
  18. Symons GM, Davies C, Shavrukov Y, Dry IB, Reid JB and Thomas MR (2006) Grapes on steroids. Brassinosteroids are involvedin grape berry ripening. Plant Physiology 140: 150-158 PMid:16361521 PMCid:PMC1326039
  19. Tambe TB (2002) Effect of gibbrellic acid in combination with brassinosteroidon berry size, yield and quality of Thompson Seedless grapes. Journal of Maharashtra AgricultureUniversity 27: 151-153
  20. Warusavitharana AJ, Tambe TB and Kshirsagar DB (2008) Effect of cytokinins and brassinosteroid with gibber-ellic acid on yield andquality ofThompson Seedless grapes. Acta Horticulturae785:217-224 https://doi. org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.785.27
  21. Zaharah SS, Singh Z, Symons GM and Reid JB (2012) Role of brassinosteroids, ethylene, abscisic acid, and indole-3- acetic acid in mango fruit ripening. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation31:363-372 s00344-011-9245-5